Re: Objection! (was: ...con HIV)

["Diem Quynh Nguyen" <diemquynhng@hotmail.com>]

>Hello anh Vinh and folks,
>
>        Yesterday, I wrote "play with the data against your hypothesis" does
>NOT mean AGAINST your hypothesis per se; it should be read as corroborate
>your hypothesis. Any theory or proposition can and should be tested by data.
>I believe that our (Vietnamese) medical research lacks this credibility. I
>visited the faculty of medicine in 1993 and found that a lot of research
>data obtained there had not been evaluated properly. 
>
>        Nevertheless, your own clinical observation is very important.
>Remember the case of Dr McBride in the journal Lancet years ago? I suggest
>you to document (or recollect) data on AIDS and double pneumonia plus any
>other medical parameters that you deem relevant. You might consider a sort
>of case-control study (I can talk to you more on this kind of design, if you
>wish). It is not difficult nor long to analyse the data and publish the
>results (if they are interesting).
>
>        Re the question of "whether the AIDS patient can get cancer as a
>result of AIDS?", I have asked a colleague here and he told me that there is
>weak evidence for this association, although the precise mechanism is not
>clear. You can perform a MEDLINE search to see any research has been done in
>this important area.
>
>        Kind regards,
>
>
>        Tuan Nguyen


 Hi Ca'c ba'c:
 Ca'm o*n ba'c Tua^'n Nguyen. Hoan nghe^nh y' kie^'n cu?a ba'c . To^i co' ddo.c 
mo^.t so^' paper ba'o ca'o be^.nh nha^n bi. be^.nh AIDS co' bi. be^.nh Kaposi's 
sarcoma. Vi` kho^ng theo do~i tie^'p tu.c ne^n to^i kho^ng bie^'t co' ai dda~ 
nghie^n cu*'u ve^` mechanism cu?a AIDS va` Kaposi's sarcoma kho^ng ? Ne^'u ba'c 
bie^'t xin chi? gia'o .
 Best regards
 DQ
_________________________


---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------