[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: to joke or not to joke




Tua^'n Pha.m wrote:

> Co`n ne^'u cu+' no'i ve^` ngu+o+`i kho^ng co' ma(.t
> trong vnsa la` pha?i vie^'t theo kie^?u
> "to^n tro.ng ngu+o+`i va(ng ma(.t" thi`, leo o^i, co`n
> ai da'm phe^ bi`nh gi` tre^n vnsa nu+~a! Cha(?ng nhe~
> chi? no'i ve^` nhau tho^i! Ma` kho^ng hie^?u 
> khi ba'c NVKhanh "ma^.p mo+`" ve^` cu. Vu~ Ngo.c Phan va` 
> ca? chu.c cu. kha'c, ba'c a^'y co' "to^n tro.ng ngu+o+`i
> va('ng ma(.t" hay la` "tu+ ca'ch ke? si~" kho^ng nhi?

Xin la^.p la.i mo^.t la^`n nu*~a, la` dda'ng ly' ra NVK 
pha?i nha^.n ddu*o*.c nhu*~ng lo*`i phe^ bi`nh cu?a ngu*o*`i 
ddo.c ve^` ba`i MNKP vi` ddo' la` su*. ye^u ca^`u cu?a ta'c
gia? khi ddo^`ng y' cho dda<ng ba`i. Co`n Vu~ Ngo.c Phan 
hay ai ddi nu*~a dde^`u cha<?ng co' lie^n quan gi` dde^'n 
vu. na`y cho ne^n Bu`i to^i xin mie^~n ba`n.

Hope that's clear enough.

Ian