Re: DDo^ng A (was Tra? lo+`i NVK ....)

[Ngoc Minh Nguyen <nmn@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au>]

On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, James Dang wrote:

> >> Hi, DDo^ng A nghi~a la` sao va^.y a' ?  DDo^ng thi` to+' chi? bie^'t
> >> co' ba'c DDo^ng Ta` Hoa`ng Du+o+.c Su+ tho^i\.
> 
> >Hi,
> 
> >DDo^ng A  la` chu+~ ddu+o+.c la^'y tu+` ca^u "DDo^ng A
> >nha^.p xua^'t" tu+` sa^'m cu?a Tra.ng Tri`nh
> 
> Lo,
> 
> I thought DDo^ng A nghi~a la` (ho.) Tra^`n\.  I learned this from those
> tie^?u thuye^'t kie^'m hie^.p li.ch su+? cu?a Ye^n Tu+? Cu+ Si~\.  Please
> correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> QA  
> 
 
  To^i nho*' ra(ng` (ho.) Tra^n` theo tie^ng' Han' go^m` hai chu*~ DDo^ng
va` A ghep' lai..Trong mo^t. so^' tie^u? thuye^t' lich. su*? co' ca^u
"Hao` khi' DDong A " la` noi' ve^` giai ddoan. khang' chie^n' cho^ng'
qua^n Nguye^n Mo^ng.
  MN