Re: To^? to^m & cha('n. -Reply -Reply

[Frank Nguyen <frank.nguyen@medtronic.com>]

Hi ba'c Thanh and all,

Ca? la`ng VNSA chi? bo^'n tay cho+i cha('n tho^i sao ?  Ngoa`i ba'c Tua^'n
(Hung), ba'c Thanh, ba'c So+n TC va` to^i ra, co`n ai nu+~a cho ddu? na(m
cha^n mo^.t ho^.i cha('n dda^y ?

Ba'c Thanh o+i, coi chu+`ng ba'c pha?i dde^`n la`ng dda^'y nhe' !  Ca'i
va'n <u`> cu?a ba'c tha^.t la` impossible !  Sau dda^y la` ba'c <xu+o+'ng>:


 " dia. u`,tho^ng chiu' U` bach. thu? U` Chi, kinh'tu(' Chi hai to^m tai.
ma? co' thie^n khai"

<DDi.a u`> la` gi` ?  La^`n dda^`u to^i mo+'i nghe ddo' nhe' !  Cho+i
cha('n chu+' dda^u co' la`m tho+ Ho^` Xua^n Hu+o+ng, no'i la'i trong na`y,
ho+? ba'c ?

Tho^ng, chi'u, chi` thi` co`n ddu+o+.c chu+' ba'c u` <ba.ch thu? ma` co`n
ki'nh tu+' chi, hai to^m, co' thie^n khai> thi` la` ho+i lo^' ro^`i, ba'c
o+i !  Na`y nhe', u` ba.ch thu? chi? co' sa'u cha('n ma` ba'c dda~ co'
thie^n khai la` hai cha('n (bo^'n con), hai to^m (tam va.n, tam sa'ch,
tha^'t va(n) the^m ba cha('n nu+~a vi. chi la` na(m, the^m ki'nh tu+' chi
la` hai cha('n nu+~a \.  To^?ng co^.ng la` ba?y cha('n thi` la`m sao ba'c
u` ba.ch thu? ddu+o+.c \.  Ba'c pha?i dde^`n la`ng ma^'t tho^i ! :-)

Ba'c So+n TC o+i, cho+i ta`i ba`n la` cho+i na`m thao \.  Ba'c chi? cho
ma^'y mo'n ddu+o+.c kho^ng ?

Ti`nh tha^n,
Frank 

>>> THANH PHAM NGOC <pthanh@deakin.edu.au> - 7/21/97 11:16 PM >>>
Dear Ba'c Frank va`cac'bac' me^ Cha'(n

[deleted]

Co'bac'nao`bie^t'xu<o<ng' cho mo^t. cu' "greatest " U` possible
thi`vie^t'le^n cho to^i hoc. theo voi' ddo'la`U` "u`no^? bat'no^/ ddia~  "

Co' phai? la`: " dia. u`,tho^ng chiu' U` bach. thu? U` Chi, kinh'tu(' Chi
hai to^m tai. ma? co' thie^n khai"  khO^ng ? Lam`on chi? giup'to^i nhe'.

Regard,
Thanh