Re: DDoa.t gu+o+m Kopa'ny (2)

[tuan pham <tuan.pham@unsw.edu.au>]

Hiep Nguyen <hduc@yahoo.com> wrote

>
>Nhu+ng Sokal dda~ kho^ng du`ng LNBD dde^? la`m vie^.c
>ddo' \. Ddo' la` ca'i kha'c bie^.t quan tro.ng \.
>Mo^.t ddie^?m kha'c nu+~a la` dde^` ta`i cu?a Sokal
>la` xa~ ho^.i va` trie^'t ho.c trong khi TMH du`ng
>nhu+~ng ta'c pha^?m va(n ho.c ra dde^? phe^ bi`nh
>du+a. tre^n lua^n ly', thua^`n phong my~ tu.c va`
>tre^n chi'nh tho^'ng cu?a chi'nh tri. \. Dda^y la`
>mo^.t vie^.c la`m "controversial" va` kho^ng vu+~ng
>vi` dda~ co' nhie^`u tru+o+`ng ho+.p trong li.ch su+~
>va(n ho.c cho tha^'y ddo' la` nhu+~ng bu+o+'c ca?n
>kho^ng ca6`n thie^'t trong hu+o+'ng ddi cu?a va(n ho.c
>nghe^. thua^.t (nhu+ tru+o+`ng ho+.p xung quanh ta'c
>pha^?m cu/a D.H Lawrence, bu+'c tranh lo~a the^? cu?a
>Goya...)
>

Hi ba'c Hie^.p

Ba^.n du+~ ma` cu~ng pha?i nha?y vo^ coi hi? !
To^i ddo^`ng y' vo+'i msg na`y cu?a ba'c. Tuy nhie^n
chu+~ controversial ba'c du`ng kho^ng chi'nh xa'c la('m 
vi` thu+o+`ng no' ha`m y' mo^.t  ha`nh ddo^.ng gi` 
khie^u khi'ch, ddi ngu+o+.c la.i quy u+o+'c, accepted 
practice, "LNBD", trong khi ddo' kie^?u phe^ bi`nh 
ba(`ng "LNBD" (ddo' la` tu+` cu?a ba'c AV, co`n to^i 
thi` tha^'y go.i la` phe^ bi`nh kie^?u no^ng da^n 
gia?n di. ho+n va` ddu'ng ho+n) thi` chi? la` su+. the^?
hie^.n o'c thu? cu+.u. Mo^.t va`i dda(.c ti'nh cua? 
"LNBD"la`: vo+ ddu~a ca? na('m; a'p du.ng nh~ 
quy lua^.t hay tie^u chua^?n tu+` nh~ contexts kho^ng
thi'ch ho+.p nhu+ng quen thuo^.c; kho^ng tolerate nh~
gi` mi`nh kho^ng hie^?u hay kho^ng quen thuo^.c; va^'n 
dde^` mo+'i cu~ng gu+o+.ng ga'n ghe'p va`o 1 kinh nghie^.m 
cu~ na`o ddo' cu?a mi`nh (vi` lu+o+`i suy nghi~ the^m). 
No'i to'm la.i la` ti`m intellectual smugness ba(`ng ddu? 
mo.i ca'ch, vd "tro+`i sinh ra the^'". Tha`nh ngu+~ 
"Nothing is new under the sun", ma` ta hay du`ng 1 ca'ch 
ddu`a co+.t hay mi?a mai, ddo^'i vo+'i nh~ ng` so^'ng 
ba(`ng "LNBD" tro+? tha`nh nie^`m tin tuye^.t ddo^'i, 
1 nguo^`n comfort vo^ bie^n.

Cheers
Tuan Pham