Re: Chi'nh ta? tie^'ng Vie^.t

[Dinh Van An <divan@presto.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp>]

Hi ba'c Hoa,
 Tu+ lie^.u na`y ba'c tri'ch  o+? dda^u va^.y? 

Hoa Nguyen wrote:
> 
> Cha`o ba'c HL va` ca'c ba'c,
> Sau dda^y la`  ta`i lie^.u ve^` ca'c vu`ng trong nu+o+'c ddo.c va` vie^'t
> thanh ho?i, nga~  :
> 1/ Tu+` Ha` Nam Ninh tro+? ra phi'a Ba('c (14 ti?nh) : no'i ddu'ng ca'c
> thanh, vie^'t ddu'ng ho?i nga~.

  No'i thi` ddu'ng da^'u, co`n vie^'t ddu'ng thi` tu`y ngu+o;`i

> 2/ Thanh Hoa', Nghe^. Ti~nh (2 ti?nh) : kho^ng pha^n bie^.t hai thanh nga~
> va` na(.ng.

  Ba'c na`o da^n Nghe^. confirm du`ng, theo to^i kho^ng pha?i va^.y.
Nga~=>ho?i, ho?i=>na+.ng thi` pha?i

> 3/ Qua?ng Bi`nh, Qua?ng Tri., Thu+`a Thie^n (3 ti?nh): kho^ng pha^n bie^.t
> ba thanh sa('c, ho?i, nga~ vo+'i thanh na(.ng.

  Cu~ng kho^ng ddu'ng. Da^n 3 ti?nh na`y pha't a^m Nga~=>ho?i. La`m gi`
co' chuye^.n sa+'c ho?i nga~ tha`nh na+.ng ca? hoa' ra chi? co' 2 thanh:
huye^`n va` na+.ng la` da^n Bi`nh, Tri., Thie^n bie^'t tho^i a`???? Ta`i
lie^.u  ho+i bi. vui-:))

> 4/ Tu+` Qua?ng Nam tro+? va`o phi'a Nam (22 ti?nh): Chi? pha't a^m ddu+o+.c
> thanh ho?i (pha^n bie^.t ddu+o+.c ca'c thanh kha'c).

  Sao la.i chi? pha't a^m ddu+o+c thanh ho?i ho+? ba'c? To^i tu+o+?ng
la`: ho?i=>nga~ co`n ca'c thanh kha'c pha't a^m to^'t.


-- 
DVAn
http://ann.phys.wani.osaka-u.ac.jp/~an/