Re: Li.ch su+? Tu+? vi VN (2) (Gia Ca't Lu+o+.ng)

["Nguyen Tien Zung" <tienzung@darboux.math.univ-montp2.fr>]

Halo ca'c ba'c tha^`y bo'i

Theo quye^?n "Tu+? vi a'o bi'" cu?a Ha` La.c Da~ Phu (Le^ Tu+ Vinh) thi`
Kho^?ng Minh sinh Na(m Ta^n Da^.u (kho^ng bie^'t theo li.ch Ta^y la` na(m
na`o ?)
nga`y 10 tha'ng 4 gio+` Tua^'t, Me^.nh ta.i Mui`. La' so^' o^ng ta co' 
"Nha^.t Nguye^.t tinh minh ta' cu+?u tru`ng u+ kim ddie^.n Ta? Hu+~u
ddo^`ng cung,
Quye^`n Lo^.c Phu+o+.ng Long cu?ng chie^'u"

Nha^n dda^y xin ddu+o+.c ca'c ba'c chi? gia'o:

- Ca'i quye^?n "Tu+? vi a'o bi'" tre^n co' to^'t kho^ng ? 
So vo+i' ca'c quye^?n kha'c thi` the^' na`o?

- Ta' cu+?u tru`ng u+ kim ddie^.n nghia~ la` gi` ?

Xin dda ta.

Zung



----------
> De : Cu Huy Minh Tuan, Melbourne Australia
<GUEST2@holonic.gse.rmit.EDU.AU>
> A : Multiple recipients of list <vnsa-l@csd.uwm.edu>
> Objet : Re: Li.ch su+? Tu+? vi VN (2)
> Date : jeudi 31 juillet 1997 06:02
> 
>   Hi ca'c ba'c 
>   To^i xin ma.o muo^.i chen va`o va`i ca^u.
>   
>   Bac The Hung Nguyen wrote:  
> > 
> > Do tui chi? tri'ch (vi` no' da`i qua') chu+' o^ng Ha`i na`y co' 
> > Nha^.t cu+ Ma~o, Nguye^.t cu+ Ho+.i , Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u
> > gio^'ng nhu+ so^' cua? Kho^?ng MInh va^.y.
>   
>   To^i co' xem so^' Kho^?ng Minh o*? -da^u -do' ro^`i thi` pha?i. La' 
> so^' to^i -du*o*.c xem co' Me^.nh ta.i Mu`i. Me^.nh ta.i Da^.u thi` 
> la`m sao co' Nguye^.t ta.i Ho*.i chie^'u va`o -du*o*.c
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > >2/ Ca^u " dda.i ha.n o+? cung ty', Ma~ ga(.p Dda` la...." nghi~a la` 
> > gi` ???. Cu+' theo ca^u na`y ma` xe't thi` co' the^? hie^?u la` : Ma~ 
> > cu~ng o+? trong cung ty'. 
> > 
> > Ca^u na`y xin ddu+o+.c kha^'t dde^? tui  ve^` xem la.i dda~
> 
>   Ma~ kho^ng bao gio*` o*? cung Ty' nhu*ng sao lu*u Ma~ co' the^? o*? 
> cung Ty'
> 
> > 
> > Cheers.
> >