Re: Thu+? nhi`n ve^` xu hu+o+'ng ...

[AnHai Doan <anhai@cs.washington.edu>]

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Aiviet Nguyen wrote:
>    Tuy nhie^n ca'c kie^.n tu+o+'ng ddo^?i mo+'i trong tho+`i ky` na`y
> va^~n chu? tru+o+ng "chu+`a tri' thu+'c ra". Chi? tru+` su+. bo^.t
> pha't cu?a Nguye^~n Huy Thie^.p trong Cu'n ve^` "anh ba.n tie^'n si~
> ngu+~ va(n", no'i chung thi` mo^.t phong ca'ch ddo^` ga`n A' Ddo^`ng
> (NHT) hay tri' thu+'c Ta^y phu+o+ng (PTH) ho+i tha^m thu'y chu+~ nghi~a
> va^~n ddu+o+.c coi tro.ng. 

Hi, I'm curious as to whether "DDa'm cu+o+'i kho^ng co'
gia^'y gia' thu'" by Ma Van Khang should be considered a
major beating on the intellectuals. "Pho^'" by Chu Lai also
depicts the incapability of actions by the intellectuals.
These books appeared in the late 80s, long before Marie
Se^'n, Cu'n, or CHCC.

Hai.