Re: Ti'nh ca'ch... (3)

[Tran Minh Tien <tran@idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>]

> > Ne^'u xoa'y la^u qua' thi` "lu.c", "lam" ... cu~ng xoa'y tu+`
> > tho+`i Ma~ Vie^.n ro^`i\.
>  Oh, yes. But is there any evidence that these words were stolen at Ma~ 
> Vie^.n time?
>   If the governer class of Giao Chi? was like Anglo-Saxon, we cannot
> talk about stealing. The South-East Asian race was something like the 
> Brittons or Celtics...

Xe't cu`ng ly' thi` cha? co' ba(`ng chu+'ng gi`\.
Nhu+ng ne^'u con cha'u vua So+? tranh hu`ng tranh ba' gi` ddo'
cha.y xuo^'ng qua' Li~nh Nam, thi` sao co' ca'i chu+~ kho^ng
mang theo\. Ca'c tro^'ng ddo^`ng co^? lo^~ co' ca'i na`o co'
chu+~, tru+` ca'i ma^'y tro^'ng ddo+`i mo+'i hay ca'i tro^'ng
chi mo+'i dda`o o+? Co^? loa\.
Ne^'u kho^ng xoa'y tho+`i Ma~ Vie^.n thi` cu~ng xoa'y tru+o+'c
ddo'\. Lu.c, lam ... la` tu+` go^'c Ha'n, cha? tha^'y ai no'i
chi pha?i xe't la.i\.  Co' xe't la.i thi` xe't nhu+~ng tu+`
nhu+ "nu+o+ng", "hu`ng" ...


>    Kho^ng bie^'t ca'i hi`nh " vie^n pha^n" la` "thu? tu+o+.ng" cu?a 


Hi`nh na`y cha(?ng co' chi ma` pha?i thu? tu+o+.ng\. DDo' la` tu+`
ghe'p chi'nh phu.\. Co' pha?i "pha^n" la` "pha^n" dda^u\.
("Ai ddem pha^n ca^'t la^'y mu`i hu+o+ng").


> ngu+o+`i Ta`u hay cu?a ngu+o+`i Vie^.t. Ca'i ca^u cu?a Mao Chu? Ti.ch:
>       " Tri' thu+'c kho^ng dda'ng..." la` nga`i ho.c ddu+o+.c khi ha. 
> Giang Nam hay ca'ch no'i cu?a Ho^` nam. Tie^'c qua' cu. Kho^?ng loa.i 
> ma^'y ba`i ba^.y ba. trong kinh Thi chu+' kho^ng bie^'t dda^u ta la.i 
> co' nguye^n ba?n cu?a ma^'y ca^u ti`nh ca Vie^.t o+? tre^n.     

Kho^?ng tu+? co' san ddi.nh Kinh Thi\. Nhu+ng ma` ai cu~ng cho Quan Thu+
kha'c vo+'i So+? tu+`\. Kha'c ve^` ta^'t ca? mo.i ma(.t\. Kinh Thi co`n
cha? co' So+? tu+`, huo^'ng ho^` nhu+~ng thu+' na(`m ngoa`i ri`a ma`
ham\.

Cheers,
Tran Minh Tien