Re: Theo cha^n Ba'c

[Aiviet Nguyen <aiviet@cat.syr.edu>]

Hi Anh Tie^'n,

  Thanks for the interseting info. I have never read this stuff. But I 
think this is "Bo^' la'o". I don't believe that Mr.Phan addressed to somebody
as Cha'u, in such a situation. It should be a "Qua^n Nga~" relationship.
Cheers
Aiviet


On Mon, 9 Jun 1997, Tran Minh Tien wrote:

> 
> >   Anh cho nghe ca'i ly' lua^.n ta.i sao chu+a thi` la` ngu.y ta.o ma` 
> > cha'u thi` la.i co' the^? ddu+o+.c. ( To^i ho?i cho bie^'t tho^i cha(?ng 
> > bie^'t Vi~nh Si'nh la` anh na`o sa^'t).
> 
> 
> Hi ba'c A'i Vie^.t, 
> 
> Ta.i vi` chu+~ "chu'a" ("chu'a" chu+' kho^ng pha?i "chu+a", ne^'u la`
> "chu+a" thi` ca^u cu.t lu?n, thie^'u ve^' do co`n chu+~ "ngoa`i"
> ddu+'ng tru+o+'c).
> 
> Na(m 1923 Phan Bo^.i Cha^u vie^'t "Thie^n ho^`, dde^' ho^`". Do ddo'
> co' le~ na`o 2 na(m sau Cu. dda~ than "chu'a" ro^`i ?
> 
> Ngay ca^u mo+? dda^`u cu?a bu+'c thu+ dda~ tha^'y "lo+?m kho+?m" ro^`i
> 
> " Cha'u ra^'t  ki'nh ye^u cu?a ba'c!"
> 
> Vi` kho^ng ro~ le^~ nghi xu+ng ho^ tho+`i ddo' ra sao ne^n to^i kho^ng
> da'm ha' mie^.ng ve^` ca^u na`y\. Nhu+ng dda~ "cha'u" la.i co`n "ra^'t
> ki'nh" nghe kho^ng xuo^i la('m. Cu~ng co' the^? ta.i do di.ch\.
> 
> Cuo^'i cu`ng, co' le~ chi? co' ddo^.c mi`nh to^i la` co' ve? "ddo.c tu+`ng
> ca^u, la^`n tu+`ng chu+~". Nhu+ng thu+.c la` kho^ng he^` du.ng ta^m dde^? y',
> nhu+ng cha? hie^?u sao khi ddo.c la.i tha^'y "ngu+'a ma('t" ve^` ca^u chu+~\.
> DDu'ng la` ca'i nghie^.p, cha? bie^'t la`m the^' na`o\. 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tran Minh Tien
> 
> 
> PS: A` ho^m no. co' ngu+o+`i o+? VN mo+'i sang ma'ch ba'c la`m to la('m, 
> mai sau ba'c cho+' co' dda^.p nha` cha'u nha -:))) 
> Ma` ba'c tha(ng quan tie^'n chu+'c, mu~ a'o xe^nh xang sao kho^ng cho ai
> bie^'t va^.y ? (j/j)
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> >    To^i ddo.c thu+ cu?a Phan Bo^.i Cha^u go+?i Quo^'c da^n khi ve^` nu+o+'c
> > no'i la` vie^.c nu+o+'c sau to^i dda~ co' Nguye^~n qua^n. Ho^`i ddo' thi` 
> > o^ng Vi~nh Si'nh cha('c ddang ma`i ddu~ng qua^`n.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Aiviet
> > 
> > 
>