[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [MO^~I TUA^`N MO^.T CA^U DDO^'I] - again
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Co' ve^' do^'i sau (xin lo^~i tru+o+'c ca'c ba'c la`m ve^` toa'n li'
>>thye^'t):
>>
>> Toa'n li' thuye^'t chi? thuye^'t li'
>>
>>
>> Let try!
>>
>> Son,
>>
>
> Hi Son et al.:
>
> How about this:
>
> Cu. Ly' toe't la`m toe't ly'
>
> Next person.
> DQ
>
Ve^' ddo^'i original cu?a to^i la`:
(La^`n na`y thi` pha?i xin lo^~i ca'c ba'c o+? ho^.i Co+ ho.c)
Da^n ho^.i Co+ toa`n co+ ho^.i
Any other idea?
Son,