[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MO^~I TUA^`N MO^.T CA^U DDO^'I] - again





>
>
>>	Hi All,
>>
>>	Co' ve^' do^'i sau (xin lo^~i tru+o+'c ca'c ba'c la`m ve^` toa'n li'
>>thye^'t):
>>
>>	Toa'n li' thuye^'t chi? thuye^'t li'
>>
>>	
>>	Let try!
>>	
>>	Son,
>> 
>
>        Hi Son et al.:
>
> How about this:
>
>        Cu. Ly' toe't la`m toe't ly' 
>
> Next person.
> DQ
>


Ve^' ddo^'i original cu?a to^i la`:
	(La^`n na`y thi` pha?i xin lo^~i ca'c ba'c o+? ho^.i Co+ ho.c)

	Da^n ho^.i Co+ toa`n co+ ho^.i

Any other idea?

Son,